I'm Sure You Know - an Astronomy Net God & Science Forum Message

God & Science Forum Message
Forums:	Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem


Home \| Discussion Forums \| God and Science \| Post	Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora

I'm Sure You Know

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Tim on October 2, 2003 00:13:27 UTC

i was refering to F=0 in the sense that Dr. Dick presents it in his document. but i should have stated so explicitly.
for what reason do you state "What F=0 predicts is that it's waves only."

tim

Follow Ups:

It predicts the Schrodinder equation - yanniru - October 2, 2003 - 04:06 UTC
- Feynman's path integral - harvey1 - October 2, 2003 - 14:56 UTC
  - Yes- but that is not how he did QED - yanniru - October 3, 2003 - 02:06 UTC
  - Feynman's path integral method.. - bruce - October 3, 2003 - 03:22 UTC
- the funny thing is - sagefr0g - October 2, 2003 - 21:31 UTC

Additional Information

About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy

Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2025 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins