God & Science Forum Message | |
| Forums: |
Atm ·
Astrophotography ·
Blackholes ·
Blackholes2 ·
CCD ·
Celestron ·
Domes ·
Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem |
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
||||||
Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place... The Space and Astronomy Agora |
| You Suck As A Detective Martin...
Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To Posted by Bruce on September 26, 2003 08:47:37 UTC |
I could give a Language Removed about Stafford's 'set of numbers'. My 'gig' was to show Stafford's claim to have created a theory of quantum gravity was bogus. Stafford took care of that when he predicted Newton's description of the orbit of Mercury was perfectly accurate while at the same time claiming to have derived GR from his 'set of numbers'. |
|
|
| Additional Information |
|---|
 |
| About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy |
|
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2025 John Huggins All Rights Reserved Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post. "dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET" are trademarks of John Huggins |