Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post
Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
By The Way.......................

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Alan on September 15, 2003 08:25:32 UTC

Here's a curious thing:

I found a way of modelling physics laws where "electron" is "modification" (as in: think of the universe as a big conference or discussion where every point of view gets a hearing, no one is left out; God is Love; and "electron" becomes "modification of a point-of-view").

You know the three generations of sub-atomic particles that have mystified physicists? They translate as: "cancel"; "not cancel", and "uncertain".

Lots of detail not posted; still typing it.

More clues:

"mass" becomes "uncertainty".

"force" becomes "freedom surface".

"time" becomes "referent self-reference" (as in a pendulum retracing its allegedly same path say)

"distance" becomes "uncertainty".

"electro-" becomes "generalisation.

"magnetic" becomes "specification.

"weak force" involves re-juggling back in a pattern that was juggled out.

"strong force" becomes "confining by binding together two patterns in a new comparison (it does not have to be strong; it is defined that way by number (by counting)(by repeatedly observing the alleged same items).

The "forces" of maths are closely related to the forces of physics: advanced theoretical physics can apparently relate into primary school math:

Quantum electrodynamics involves the distributive law; but where roles of addend and multiplier can be swapped.

Electro-magnetism involves addition, subtraction.

The Leibnitz equation for pi plays a starring role
(pi/4 = 1 -1/3 + 1/5 - 1/7 .............)

Weak, strong forces involve multiplication, division.

Einstein may have double defined relativity: the second time by his choice of geometry (Minkowski space-time, in one quantum (meeting of relativitities?)

Dr. Dick may have double defined quantum: the second time by his geometry of choice? (He allows an alternative explanation to any item?)..in one relativity (relativity of choice).

Dr. Dick assumes all interactions are "contact interactions"; making contact compulsory, he concludes nothing is in contact (he questions if we can really comunicate)?

But the truth shall make you free........

Peter Lynds (who has grabbed the attention of the scientific world with his paper on quantum indeterminacy and the quantum discontinuity) from what I hear looks at the idea of interactions as non-contact.....

Contact or non-contact?


-------------dolphin


Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
Google
 
Web www.astronomy.net
DayNightLine
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins