Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
Mathematics And Reality

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Paul R. Martin on September 14, 2003 17:28:49 UTC

Hi Michael,

"If I understood you correctly, you said the term "real" has no meaning in mathematics."

You understood me correctly, but I should have been more specific about the connotation of 'real' that I intended. Mathematics certainly uses the term 'real' as in "real numbers". But, as I am sure you are aware, this is simply a four-letter tag used to refer to some precisely defined abstract objects and has nothing to do with what we refer to in the vernacular as "reality".

"...if you were correct that would imply mathematics can't be used to make meaningful statements about reality. Is that correct, or is it something Wittgenstein would not like? "

I don't know how Wittgenstein would feel about this question, but I would say, Yes, it is correct. As long as you stay within the domain of mathematics, none of the statements within that domain say anything meaningful about reality.

The usefulness of mathematics to human affairs comes from someone outside the domain of mathematics noticing that some of the concepts and structures of mathematics bear a resemblance to some real things. In this case, an isomorphism might be set up between the real objects and the mathematical objects. Then the mathematical implications of the mathematical objects might be used to predict consequences of the real objects by means of the isomorphism. To the degree that this is successful, mathematics proves to be of value in the real world.

The setting up of the isomorphism and the predictions of real behavior is science, not mathematics. Even though the same person might be doing both the math and the science, as in the case of Maxwell and others, there is still a distinct line separating the two. Mathematics does not deal with, or comment on, anything real. IMHO

Warm regards,


Follow Ups:

    Login to Post
    Additional Information
    About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
    Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2023 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
    Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
    "dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
    are trademarks of John Huggins