Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
Of Course Not...

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Bruce on September 14, 2003 01:37:14 UTC

They both have a domain of applicability in which they have passed every test to this point in time. Its obvious to folks intersted in theoretical models that both have a limit. Dick claims to have bridged the gap. In essence when he says this he is claiming to have a theoretical model of quantum gravity. He can't even derive a solution of Einstein's equations from his theory [thats what the extra term is, a failure to derive a solution]. At the same time he claims everybody else is to stupid to understand what he has done.

Follow Ups:

    Login to Post
    Additional Information
    About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
    Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2018 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
    Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
    "dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
    are trademarks of John Huggins