Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
You Got It Completely Upside Down

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Harvey on August 25, 2003 21:03:46 UTC

Look everyone. Alan's posts make as much sense when turned upside down as they do when posted rightside up. What does this tell us? Alan's thinking is upside/rightside symmetrical?:


A minimilistic math description of the scenario presumably gives math-physics structure out of the numbers and effect of definition interactions.

Fuller detail not worked out here. Getting muddled.

requires the "gen." become "spec." + "spec." IN GEN. (provided by the generalising effect of: "again") which mathematically minimilistically described seems recalibrates back in time the original "spec.'s" ?

BUT to see your two mv's again after the collision

So "spec" meets "spec"
So get "gen".

Get a collision: mv meets mv

SO "mv" becomes: "spec".

which gives: spec. (as two generalisations can give "specification").

get: gen.gen

get: gen.gen. /1

cancel the gen.specs

mv = gen. gen.spec. gen./ gen.spec


generalisation (call: "gen.") (the mass) at
gen.spec. ("generalisation specification" as "directed") gen. (distance) per gen.spec (per time)

mass at velocity per time (momentum)


(math counting fills the "could" with "must" by forcing numbers by repeating the pattern and counting repeats; by definition of the number of repeats you get "physics laws" seeming compulsory but this appears to come say from "number" itself.

specification + specification: generalisation
(like red car + blue bus could give "coloured vehicle" say).

generalisation + generalisation: specification (like "car" + "red" can give "red car").


distance: generalisation

time: generalisation specification (as pendulum path is general; but specified by next swing)

speed: distance per time.

direction: generalisation specification (e.g. any two bounding localities referring to another locality gives specification of direction by mutual agreement (like two astronauts referring to a third (observer) to decide "which way is "up" ?).

velocity: directed speed per time

When two masses collide: a minimilistic math description gives an appearance of the familiar laws.

the laws of classical mechanics and QED seem to be resulting from the math-way of describing.


Follow Ups:

    Login to Post
    Additional Information
    About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
    Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2018 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
    Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
    "dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
    are trademarks of John Huggins