Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post
Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
I Was Curious...

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Duane Eddy on August 17, 2003 21:26:20 UTC

About which of the two basic choices would be considered the most preferred condition of the finished eco system.

1. Allow evolution to improve the condition in the eco system.
This will require a long time for improvement and the introduction of disease extinction etc.

2. Use you inelegance to select and modify the species introduce to expedite the process.
This option may also allow the introduction of some complicated relationships between the species which would not occur due to natural selection alone.

My first inclination is that the second approach would be used if we were capable of it.
I was curious to see if some evolution fans might want to argue the first choice should be taken.

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
Google
 
Web www.astronomy.net
DayNightLine
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2018 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins