Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post
Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
What Is Obvious To You Might Be True

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Mikey Pearson on August 5, 2003 05:37:10 UTC

Harvard PhD. Richard Ruquist wrote this note
(in its entirety):
"Mike Is Obviously Disturbed by what people think of him on this forum. Otherwise he would not go out of his way to discuss me when I have not responded to him. Regarding the origin of ideas that are published in science. My experience teaches me that ideas largely come from the very few genius type scientists. I am not one. Richard"

Thank you for this. I am still trying to comprehend its logical structure. It appears you are posing an hypothesis (first sentence)
followed by a conclusion (second sentence) which, quite mysteriously, you seem to believe proceeds from your hypothesis. The third sentence follows a very grand sentence fragment which seems to promise illumination about "the origin of ideas that are published in science."
In the last two lines, I could not quite make out whether Ruquist was complimenting me or
being funny. Anyway, thanks.
Mike


Follow Ups:

    Login to Post
    Additional Information
    Google
     
    Web www.astronomy.net
    DayNightLine
    About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
    Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2018 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
    Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
    "dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
    are trademarks of John Huggins