you might see that what I write about is in fact a demonstration of the non-reducibility, eternal-life nature of "what exists"; that math is just math.

My logicism sees language as a real causal consequence of Ding an sich. Language of the Ding an sich is an approximate reduction that brings to life approximate realities. The language is what I refer to as the Logos. This creates an onion-like existence where each 'layer of the onion' can be pealed away and more known about the Ding an sich (i.e., the approximation is 'closer' to the actual thing-itself). As each onion layer is pealed away, a 'new reality' takes on significance.

Where we differ Alan is that I'm a believer in epistemic reasoning. You are lost in your ontic world of getting caught up in tautologies. It is so bad that I think you are no longer communicating with anyone. Just that you are not aware that you are not communicating.

• misunderstanding - dolphin - July 31, 2003 - 11:13 UTC
  • Serious question - harvey1 - July 31, 2003 - 13:45 UTC
    • No - dolphin - August 4, 2003 - 00:42 UTC