Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post
Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
My View Is This

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Harvey on July 27, 2003 13:16:02 UTC

you might see that what I write about is in fact a demonstration of the non-reducibility, eternal-life nature of "what exists"; that math is just math.

My logicism sees language as a real causal consequence of Ding an sich. Language of the Ding an sich is an approximate reduction that brings to life approximate realities. The language is what I refer to as the Logos. This creates an onion-like existence where each 'layer of the onion' can be pealed away and more known about the Ding an sich (i.e., the approximation is 'closer' to the actual thing-itself). As each onion layer is pealed away, a 'new reality' takes on significance.

Where we differ Alan is that I'm a believer in epistemic reasoning. You are lost in your ontic world of getting caught up in tautologies. It is so bad that I think you are no longer communicating with anyone. Just that you are not aware that you are not communicating.

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
Google
 
Web www.astronomy.net
DayNightLine
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2018 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins