is specific. Please feel free to comment, Alan.
Don't be so shy. When someone points
out some loopholes and vacancies in your sequence of reasoning, that is supposed to be
helpful. On this forum, most folks don't
seem to like it blunt counter information
presented in a way which cannot possibly hurt them unless they are afraid of information about science (and theological opinions) in the neutral format of this forum.
They seem to think they have been bluntly "struck" by pixils
but probably their pain comes from selfpunishing because their religion taught them wrongly what their duty is in this instance.
I do like blunt counterinformation presented in a way which cannot possibly hurt me, expecially when it is valid or at least sincere (in which case I can respond with reasoning and information. Your response is too vague to do that...
Regards,
Mike