Although I didn't like this post-

Entitled: Yeth anonymouth Harv; pleathe exthplain all thith!, dated July 17, 2003 - 19:00 UTC, by Mike Pearson

http://www.astronomy.net/forums/god/messages/28345.shtml

Mike, we were getting along fine. Then you make unfounded statements about my faith in Christ, and ONCE AGAIN my anonymity. Get off of it! If you can't say something constructive or at least contributory, then please do not respond to my posts.

And please leave me alone about my being anonymous. At first it was funny, now I'm tired of it.

The date and time of your above post precedes my joke (that you referred to as an insult) to Mike Levine. Therefore, you started it! My joke was a result of my feelings at the time after having read your derogatory post.

There.

Now let me just check all my spelling and the accuracy of my citations and accusations before I hit "submit". After all I'm confronting the 'nitpickingist' poster on this forum (and that's a consensus opinion, not a provable fact). I've got to be sure I acknowledge and state explicitly the difference between opinion and fact as you're too stupid to understand when the difference is implied. Hey, there goes another opinion...

...Yup. All looks good to me. Spelling ... check. Facts distinguished from opinions ... check. Factual citations ... check. We're good to go!

• I think consensus opinion should not be cited - carefuluniverse - July 18, 2003 - 05:07 UTC
  • I'm a contributory component of said consensus... - smartguy - July 18, 2003 - 05:16 UTC
    • arf arf ....arf arf ....arf arf arf.....hee haw..hee haw.... - kantolfir2 - July 18, 2003 - 06:29 UTC