Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
Who Does?

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Whittier on July 13, 2003 01:19:30 UTC

Hi Paul
If "we" claim that the conscious thinking knowing parts is "unity" then you have only done part of the process of proving it. I am not trying to dispense with "some of us," but I've found coalition-building to be difficult...contrary to what it might seem if we are all one (*in every way*).

Regarding Brilliant Pebbles: has an article

at Ruquist wrote
“It actually was well known in certain circles that the deployment was inherently vulnerable. I just produced and published some simple theorem-like math to illustrate the problem. The end result is Brilliant Pebbles which is not inherently vulnerable.”

the same guy? wrote: “The only pet idea I have is to keep weapons out of space, especially missiles like Brilliant Pebbles.”

This forum search instrument does not yield any response to “Canavan” but I'm sure Ruquist told the story several times about Canavan giving Ruquist credit for some of the concept of Brilliant Pebbles. Are the archives scoured?

Just our luck.

Follow Ups:

    Login to Post
    Additional Information
    About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
    Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2021 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
    Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
    "dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
    are trademarks of John Huggins