~~~1) You're anonymous on this forum, so how can you be hurt on this forum?~~~

Correct.

Is that why you want me to be unanonymous? So you can hurt me? Just kidding Mike, Lol ; )

~~~If you cannot be hurt, how can you take criticism as an attack?~~~

Ok, 'attack' - bad word to use. Hows about 'defense'?

~~~Your statements were attacked, but that is exactly what they deserved and well within the
purpose of a forum.~~~

Correct yet again. No argument here...

~~~You are easily able to place your statements side-by-side with anything said about or to you.~~~

...Still, no argument.

~~~Thus, "attack on me" is clearly a propaganda term rather than a real description of what occurred.~~~

...remember that next time you address Yanniru.

~~~2) While I called you names, you alleged misconduct by me which you had not carefully checked out in advance or after I asked you to double check your facts.~~~

I got bored with the whole thing and decided to leave it alone. Besides, I have no personal issues with you. Half the stuff I said was on defensive impulse in the heat of argument, you're really a good guy.

~~~Your statements about me were clearly more attack-like personally, and I am not anonymous.~~~

You are to me (I have not read your resume or biography), and shall remain so. I have no interest in who you are or what you do, but I do take interest in what you write in this forum.

~~~If you want to go around, we can compare statements you made about me to statements I made about you.~~~

Naw... not necessary.

~~~What did Jesus say? I am the way and the truth and the life. If you believe in God, as you say, then truth must be important to you. But it is not easily arrived at sometimes.~~~

Maybe you were completely right all along. My appologies... (if you're willing to accept).

• Thank you - carefuluniverse - July 4, 2003 - 19:36 UTC