How about:
dot: how see dot? Need a background to distinguish it.
Two dots: they meet: quantum.
They exchange ideas: dot A modifies his views: call this modification: "electron".
dot B modifies his views "rotates around dot A's perspective"; call this "the second electron in the sshell"
Two dots meet a third dot: but which one is first, which is last, which is in the middle?
Now we have: "direction". We have "sequence".
Does dot A and dot B point to dot C?
Concept of "direction" has appeared.
How many ways can the three dots modify each other's opinion by exchanging ideas?
One can continue and map (apparently)(have done a lot of this already): periodic table; electronshell structure; Pauli exclusion principle; quantum electrodynamics; quantum chromodynamics; laws of motion; laws of electromagnetism; gravity; Van de Waals forces; etc. etc.
Physics appears to be the sequencing information missing in mathematics (math says 1+1+1+1= 4 but doesn't specify order).
Everything in creation appears to be about exchanging ideas; let every voice have a hearing; let all perspectives be taken into consideration: God is LOVE; letting be; Existence; freedom in freedom; concious freedom in Existence.
Once you get to 4 dots: spacetime.
5 dots: "number 5 is alive" seems to be apt.
Physics: map from Leibnitz equation for pi:
pi/4 as pi/4 dimensions as
pi/ compare two mpatterns, make new comparison
= 1 1/3 + 1/5  1/7 + 1/9  1/11 + 1/13  1/15 + 1/17 1/19 + 1/21 ....
Think of the seventh as a trampoline on which mathematical sommersaults can be done (e.g, triple twist backflip) via variations in the 1/3 + 1/5 in pi/4 view?
dot,dot meet: point
dot,dot,dot meet: plane
dot,dot,dot,dot meet: sphere
dot,dot,dot,dot,dot meet: hypersphere (make stuff in spacetime; living space.
quantum: meeting
electron: modification
electro: generalisation
magnetic: specification
proton: promoted view
neutron: neutral ground
upquark: new juggled pattern
downquark: old pattern survives
strangequark: "no comment" pattern
weak force: reappearance of a pattern juggled out then back in
strong force: new pattern supposedly confined by new associations
gravity: coming together
entropy: flying apart
blackbody "allegedly perfectly radiating and absorbing body": mathematics?
Why did inventing a "blackbody" solve physics problems? Allowed math to meet math? Math numbers absorb and radiate "1" s.
photon: comparison
speed of light constant: speed of speed: comparison of comparison: constant.
energy: alternatives
mass: "uncertainty"
E = mc squared: alternatives = uncertainty of comparison of comparison = alternative ways of comparing things!
Force: freedom surface
Time: like a pendulum retraces its own path: selfreferent reference distance
Particles occur in three generations: cancel; notcancel; uncertain
ABCD becomes new abcd in E perspective:
gluons: E uncertainty gives 8 gluons
Full details not given here: just off the top of my head real quick here.
Musical chairs; join the dots, know the difference.
Problem with math: assumes numbers are equally spaced and same size. Zeno's arrow seems involved in math the way numbers are built by selfreference in a pyramid structure of "1" s?
Physics by rhyme:
Hey diddle diddle (math meet math) the cat (Schrodinger's cat) and the fiddle (is it alive or dead?) the cow jumped over the moon (neither, the background hasn't done a deal with the subject yet so anything logically consistent is possible apparently) the little dog laughed to see such fun (joy of freedom in freedom: creation) and the dish ran away with the spoon (logical consistency: and a new creation is made and a new now).
details later.
Alan
