Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post
Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
Arguing Or Classifying?

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Harvey on June 2, 2003 00:29:42 UTC

Paul, call it what you want, but there is a major difference between you and Dick with regard to the interpretation issues. For example, Dick obviously sees his work as pertaining to restrictions in supernatural laws (see http://www.astronomy.net/forums/god/messages/26691.shtml ) and there are many, many other areas that extend beyond even this metaphysical discussion. You, on the other hand, appear content to cut out all the fluff and would submit Dick's paper as a mathematical paper where reality becomes 'R1', known becomes 'K1', unknown becomes 'K2', subconscious becomes 'SC', and so on. How willing do you really think Dick would be to the tearing apart of his paper along these lines? If you think he would be actually willing to do so, then you are kidding yourself.

Warm regards, Harv

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
Google
 
Web www.astronomy.net
DayNightLine
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2018 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins