Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post
Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
Interesting

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by A. Souza on May 23, 2003 17:16:32 UTC

I especially liked this bit:

" In any case, adding bound information [...] reduces the scheme to vacuity. Frieden pulls these terms from [out of the air], and they seem to have no independent significance whatsoever. They are simply whatever he needs to get the equation he wants at the end of the variational problem "

It's the same with Dick's work. It all sounds impressive, until you try to find justifications for the things he pulls out of the air, such as unknowable data and frequent appeals to the magical powers of the subconscious. In both cases, "I do this because it gives me what I want" seem to be the only real justification.

Follow Ups:

    Login to Post
    Additional Information
    Google
     
    Web www.astronomy.net
    DayNightLine
    About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
    Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2021 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
    Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
    "dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
    are trademarks of John Huggins