Even though I don't agree with Kyle on his opinions on consciousness, I have no intention of arguing with him as I'm of the opinion that talking about consciousness is a waste of time (which is why I believe Dennett is a fool; I don't think he's wrong as much as I think he's foolish for thinking he's right)

But the real problem with Kyle's argument is his last paragraph:

" The luxury that I have as an agnostic is that I am free to choose to believe any theory which best fits the data, without prejudice "

All I could possibly say in response to that is, excuse me while I laugh my head off. I was hoping you could offer something more profound.

• Oh... - harvey1 - May 15, 2003 - 15:47 UTC