Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Aurino Souza on May 15, 2003 14:39:17 UTC

Even though I don't agree with Kyle on his opinions on consciousness, I have no intention of arguing with him as I'm of the opinion that talking about consciousness is a waste of time (which is why I believe Dennett is a fool; I don't think he's wrong as much as I think he's foolish for thinking he's right)

But the real problem with Kyle's argument is his last paragraph:

" The luxury that I have as an agnostic is that I am free to choose to believe any theory which best fits the data, without prejudice "

All I could possibly say in response to that is, excuse me while I laugh my head off. I was hoping you could offer something more profound.

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins