I think
if posts were required to be at least 200 words, in the interest of causing actual ideas to be exposed or revealed then the fact that fewer clutter posts were registered would make the forum easier to read and enjoy. This makes no distinction between
different viewpoints. It is harder to be a liar at length, I think than with all those quick punchy ones.
I think Ezekiel's posts have been fairly moderate in the sense that their total number is small andthey do not actually seem to ruin the forum's flow ( with a few exceptions, such as times when, instead of an answer to one of my posts, we got a batch of interjections by Ezekiel which at least seem off-topic. It seems to be a kind of ecology. If there were
too many posts in any style, it would lose even more flair.

• So... - harvey1 - May 13, 2003 - 20:02 UTC
  • La...Ti....Doh . . . a deer, nebula deer - quiet - May 13, 2003 - 20:24 UTC
    • Maybe not - harvey1 - May 13, 2003 - 20:33 UTC
      • You haven't answered me point by point - quiet - May 13, 2003 - 20:56 UTC
      • I agree it is good to think of the benefit of others - quiet - May 13, 2003 - 21:07 UTC
        • Indeed, It Is. - phillipmartin - May 14, 2003 - 04:52 UTC