At http://www.astronomy.net/forums/god/messages/26389.shtml, Aurino wrote:
"If I'm correct in my beliefs and a loving God is in fact behind reality, then science must necessarily be an illusion as it leads us to the opposite conclusion."

But at http://www.astronomy.net/forums/god/messages/26388.shtml
Aurino wrote:
"I'm not against science, I just think that scientists don't practice science as much as they preach it. I guess I'm against pseudo-scientific speculation, because I think it undermines science's credibility."

This seems to be a person with two opposite
opinions about science.

• I'm flattered that you read my posts... - aurino_s - May 13, 2003 - 19:18 UTC
  • I'm as Latino as yo, but a better scientist and/or theologian - quiet - May 13, 2003 - 20:30 UTC
    • What are your credentials to call yourself a scientist - yaniru - May 14, 2003 - 01:09 UTC
      • OOOOO O OOOO OOO O OOO OO - quiet - May 14, 2003 - 06:31 UTC
      • My 100+ credits in science are more recent than yours - quiet - May 14, 2003 - 06:39 UTC
        • I published my best ever paper here - yaniru - May 14, 2003 - 12:07 UTC
          • Yanniru must be a forgetful Harvard alumnus - quiet - May 14, 2003 - 15:13 UTC
            • "I will not be answering Yanniru's spams any more - quiet - May 14, 2003 - 15:14 UTC
              • You forgot to mention what school so we could check it out - yaniru - May 15, 2003 - 02:24 UTC
      • Scientists have PhDs, Not BSs - yaniru - May 15, 2003 - 02:26 UTC