Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
I Thought I Agreed With That

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Richard Ruquist on May 9, 2003 14:38:43 UTC

When I talked about an object at a distance having spherical symmetry, it is based on ignorance; and as we get closer, an elongated object may look like mirror symmetry, also due to our ignorance or our perception; and finally when close enough, the object is complex without any percievable symmetry. I agreed that symmetry comes from our ignorance in this toy model of perception. You essentially agreed with it in the CPT story.

Our subconscious in Stafford's words are making a reasonable approximation to fit what we see. I have no objection to that aspect of Stafford's theory. I do not like his definition of reality, prefering to use the word perception instead.


So in this regard we both agreed with Stafford

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins