You just said it.

The irony is that you do not seem to be able to communicate the problem you are solving. At least it is over my head. Is that info then outside the scope of your model?

My dreams are commnicable. So your model must apply to my dreams. Yet they contain behavior outside the laws of physics, and presumably outside the scope of your modelling?? That's a question.

Likewise there are experiments such as the EPR experiments that are outside the scope of the physics that derives from your model. Is entanglement part of your model?

You say that your model does not make predictions, and then say that many of the laws of physics come from it- actually most of them. But the laws of physics can make predictions. How is this not a contradiction?

yanniru

• Contradições - aurino_c_souza - April 26, 2003 - 11:29 UTC
• Communication isn't over till it's over. - doctordick - April 26, 2003 - 21:56 UTC
  • Authorities? - bruce - April 27, 2003 - 06:27 UTC
    • We enjoy comparing bruce's input to Dr. Dick's - carefuluniverse - April 27, 2003 - 17:09 UTC
    • Cranks are necessary to start First Generation Inventions - carefuluniverse - April 27, 2003 - 18:51 UTC