Yanniru accuses me of various things.
But when asked to assemble evidence
with proper protocol and logic,
he never does. He thinks it is good
to follow me around for more than a
year, offering his casual opinion
more than a hundred times that I am
more or less a goat. Yet he does not
use proper protocol, careful logic,
or good evidence. Instead, he uses
the methods of
1) repetitition
2) electioneering
3) ad hominem attacks

When others engaged in the most
unmistakable personal attacks on me,
Yanniru was silent and not critical.
But when Harv or someone suggests that
my critical analysis amounts to ad hominem
attack, Yanniru apparently agrees.
Harv, I remember, is anonymous -- not
accountable.

I do not think it is a personal attack
to say Yanniru's continual references to me
are
1) hypocritical
2) inaccurate
3) illogical
4) sloppily assembled

Mike Pearson

• Mike is correct - yaniru - April 20, 2003 - 22:52 UTC
  • PS - yaniru - April 20, 2003 - 22:54 UTC
    • Hi Richard - robertgregory - April 21, 2003 - 05:18 UTC
      • This should work - yaniru - April 21, 2003 - 11:38 UTC
  • Yaniru/Yannirus is being malicious and off-topic as usual - quiet - April 21, 2003 - 06:18 UTC