To Scientifically 'compare,' You Would Not Use This Method - an Astronomy Net God & Science Forum Message

God & Science Forum Message
Forums:	Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem


Home \| Discussion Forums \| God and Science \| Post	Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora

To Scientifically 'compare,' You Would Not Use This Method

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Michael W. Pearson on March 28, 2003 19:20:44 UTC

If Y*'s intention is an honest comparison between
the content we have each posted, we must have
1) method of sampling data (or complete data comparison)
2) objective criteria for comparison.
3) a scientific audit to be sure the archives
have not been altered.

True or false:
Y* has posted several hundred spams following posts by me.

Follow Ups:

All you have to do is read - yaniru - March 29, 2003 - 03:20 UTC
- Y* writes: "A scientific comparison is just crap." - quiet - March 29, 2003 - 04:07 UTC
- All you have to do is read unaltered archives, not Y*'s version - quiet - March 29, 2003 - 18:53 UTC

Additional Information

About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy

Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins