Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post
Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
Thanks For Asking Those Questions

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by M.W.Pearson on March 13, 2003 08:51:00 UTC

I don't want to emphasize shallowness.
Please forgive the brevity tonight.
"We" is too simplified. Some surely do, some don't -- at least by their own accounts.
"The" truth is too simplified. Context and
complexity seem a necessary part of a truth
having to do with life.
"God's words" is too simplified. Interpretation
can play havoc with any communique'.

I knew it was a worthwhile set of questions
you ask, for I ask them too. And it leads
to complexity. Do you agree so far? In what way?

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
Google
 
Web www.astronomy.net
DayNightLine
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2021 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins