Mike first sent me an email that he claimed was sent to John Huggins. In this email addressed to John, he claimed that he was being blocked from this forum and was asking John what he had done to deserve such a punishment. He suggested that it might have been his use of profanity and he discussed the various forms of profanity.

This of course was a complete lie on the part of Mike Pearson. He was trying to make me believe that he was kicked out of the forum. So in my reply I expessed my wonder at how he could possibly be blocked, as he could merely register under a different name, as he has done in the past morwe than a half dozen times.

He of course was trying to get me to say something stupid or revealing that he could use against me on this forum. That is called sandbagging in military circles. You can decide if he succeeded.

yanniru

• Copy of Mike's Email - yaniru - January 21, 2003 - 12:57 UTC
  • I would like an opinion about me from a qualified observer - quiet - January 21, 2003 - 18:19 UTC
    • You may get one - yaniru - January 21, 2003 - 19:08 UTC
      • I sent that to him on January 16 - carefuluniverse - January 21, 2003 - 19:24 UTC
  • Response to part of that - carefuluniverse - January 21, 2003 - 19:21 UTC
    • Our rudeness is just a reflction of yours - yaniru - January 22, 2003 - 00:15 UTC
      • Please post content - carefuluniverse - January 22, 2003 - 01:09 UTC
        • Why do you never talk about science - yaniru - January 22, 2003 - 12:51 UTC
          • My ratio of science to verbiage is better than yours - quiet - January 22, 2003 - 17:38 UTC
• Almost every statement you made is from sloppy factoring - quiet - January 21, 2003 - 18:34 UTC