God & Science Forum Message | |
| Forums: |
Atm ·
Astrophotography ·
Blackholes ·
Blackholes2 ·
CCD ·
Celestron ·
Domes ·
Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem |
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
||||||
Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place... The Space and Astronomy Agora |
| Elaboration
Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To Posted by Mario Dovalina on January 3, 2003 05:17:24 UTC |
In my opinion, the point is that ideas and beliefs should be capable of standing alone, if they are intellectually rigorous. If you claim that someone is 969 years old, or claim that the universe began in a priveval explosion, or claim that animals did or did not evolve, it should not matter what other unrelated data is present in the source. That is, if you find the idea of someone living to nearly one thousand years old to be ridiculous, it should not suddenly become plausible once it's put into a biblical context. |
|
| Additional Information |
|---|
 |
| About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy |
|
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post. "dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET" are trademarks of John Huggins |