Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Mario Dovalina on November 8, 2002 23:39:08 UTC

"you know that there are many things which we will never know, including the existence of God (whatever that is), the existence of "things in themselves" (or Ultimate Reality, or whatever), and the existence of "true" knowledge. Thus, everything else on your list is an unknown and you are left with aesthetics."

Indeed, the aesthetic appeal of an idea is one of the only things you can know more or less "for sure" about it, however in order to function in the world we need to quantify the certainty with which we hold other issues as well. The question is "what criteria to we use to do that?" In my opinion, the only criterion, that is, the best we have, is to look at a theory or a belief on a purely objective ground (compare its predictions with what observation tells us.) So, though we cannot know anything for sure, we can be *relatively* more sure that the Earth exists than tachyons exist. Thus, there is more to the list than just aesthetics, as long as you are willing to compromise a bit.

"However appealing it might be, Christianity (along with other religions) has indirectly been the result of much suffering. One should surely eliminate it just on this. But there is something else to take into account -- it might have improved a lot of people's lives as well."

I don't agree that either religion or secularism is responsible for mankind's woes. Rather, our own inherent selfishness and corruption is, and we just use ideologies as an excuse to perpetuate this suffering. I'm pretty sure that under any ideology we'd be more or less as screwed up as we are now.

"All religions and spiritual ideas are equivalent in the agnostic view, they are all possible and they are all unprovable."

Yes, but be careful not to equate "all unprovable" with "equally valid." The better an idea fits current observational data, generally the better it is.

"People just can't get over the fact that they're not the center of the universe."

No kidding. Religion is man's hubris incarnate. If mankind is truly psychologically incapable of handling a world devoid of blind faith, I'll think about officially disowning this species.

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2018 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins