Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
You're Barking The Wrong Tree Here

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Aurino Souza on November 6, 2002 17:22:52 UTC


I never accepted Dick's metaphysics for the simple reason that I don't accept anyone's metaphysics. As far as I'm concerned life must be lived on a pragmatic basis; we may entertain theories but only as a mental exercise. I think Dick's paper (or Van Flandern ideas, or Langan's CTMU) can be used for some brain workout, but taking them seriously is a huge mistake.

Ironically, you seem to take Dick's paper seriously as you spend so much time trying to prove him wrong. As far as I'm concerned he doesn't deliver anything new and that is the end of the story, nothing more needs to be said. I just find it interesting that you present all sorts of philosophical arguments when a simple "show me the money", Bruce style, would do.

But then, maybe that's how you work your brain out.



(PS: I wouldn't worry about Alan, he seems to have run out of money)

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2023 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins