Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button
Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post
Login
Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
So, You Are Posing A Government Model For The Forum?

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Mike Pearson on November 5, 2002 19:37:44 UTC

I think we should NOT begin such an adventure by simply having Ruquist appoint anonymous Bruce as "relativity expert."

Seems obvious we should have a list of topics for which an "expert" is needed.


We should explain why the office of "expert" exists.

We should be able to explain why someone on the forum is needed to provide expertise when there are numerous reference resources.

We should have description of the expert's powers and the limits thereof.

And if he is to wield any authority, surely he must post his true name and resume'.

Failing to do these steps means there is no purpose to having an "expert."

Follow Ups:

    Login to Post
    Additional Information
    Google
     
    Web www.astronomy.net
    DayNightLine
    About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
    Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
    Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
    "dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
    are trademarks of John Huggins