Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post
Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
Creationist And Evolution

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Steven Andrew Jr on November 2, 2002 11:50:25 UTC

I quiet new about this stuff. But the way i think about this dispute is both assumption are correct and move along together. It just like chemical that trigger cancer(creationist) and virus resistant(evolutionary). Seeking knowledge(creationist) and utilized(evolution). Let make it simple creationist trigger evolution. Evolution without purpose is silly. adaption to surrounding are creationist. I think the scientific commnunity only 50% correct. It just like matter and antimatter both cannot exist if one is not present. Think metaphysics and think sciencetifically.

Follow Ups:

    Login to Post
    Additional Information
    Google
     
    Web www.astronomy.net
    DayNightLine
    About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
    Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2018 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
    Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
    "dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
    are trademarks of John Huggins