Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by John Pursel on October 19, 2002 16:52:12 UTC

My equation closed the circle in a Catch 22. Your equation cannot proceed past"experience" and can be written as reality=actuality=fact=decision=background. That then ends the equation with the answer=reality is true based on our background. That is my point. Reality is said to exist because we are taught that it exists.

By adding "interpretation=language=meaning", which can be written as "decipher=expression=what is meant by a word", you have introduced a non progessive argument to the equation which is not on the path of my equation.

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins