Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post
Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
Ruquist Hardly Even Studied Biology

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by M.W.Pearson on October 18, 2002 15:50:53 UTC

You weigh in on this one a little light, Richard.
Materialism is precisely the biggest flaw in
applying Natural Selection to human selection.
The faculty, mind, which discovered nature's methods is a different feature of nature which has not yet been popularly factored into Evolutionary Theory except in a hack-amateurish way such as Dialectical Materialism et. al.

If you are vouching for Dialectical Materialism
as adequate management policy for human mental output, then we know where you are coming from.
But I think you will never really go out on a limb
and adequately explain anything but crude mechanical workings of something, mind, which is much finer than those crude (and short) lines you write about it.

Cordially,
Mike

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
Google
 
Web www.astronomy.net
DayNightLine
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2018 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins