2000 BC... - an Astronomy Net God & Science Forum Message

God & Science Forum Message
Forums:	Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem


Home \| Discussion Forums \| God and Science \| Post	Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora

2000 BC...

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Mario Dovalina on October 18, 2002 03:56:34 UTC

The generally accepted date for the flood, historically, falls into the Fifth Egytian dynasty and the Yao dynasty of China.

Follow Ups:

B.C.E... - phillipmartin - October 18, 2002 - 22:15 UTC
- True Dat - stormcrow - October 18, 2002 - 23:07 UTC
- of course - emperor__alikar - October 19, 2002 - 14:51 UTC
  - Hmmm.... - stormcrow - October 19, 2002 - 20:00 UTC
    - Neither is taking God out. - emperor__alikar - October 20, 2002 - 01:56 UTC
      - Gods dating is about 5637 - yaniru - October 20, 2002 - 03:42 UTC
        
        Wow. - emperor__alikar - October 20, 2002 - 21:32 UTC
        
        Wrong - yaniru - October 21, 2002 - 11:53 UTC
        
        I said main. - emperor__alikar - October 22, 2002 - 01:32 UTC
        
        The distortions of RyeKrisp Yaniru are worse than Paul's - carefuluniverse - October 20, 2002 - 21:45 UTC
        
        Some content please - yaniru - October 21, 2002 - 11:54 UTC
        
        http://www.astronomy.net/forums/god/messages/15693.shtml - quiet - October 21, 2002 - 14:34 UTC
        
        I do not apologize for making you vulgar - yaniru - October 21, 2002 - 16:37 UTC
        
        Are YOU the God of Moses? That explains a lot. Anyway... - carefuluniverse - October 21, 2002 - 20:58 UTC
        
        Please be quiet - yanniru - October 22, 2002 - 19:22 UTC
        
        That was a worthless post; you are a spammer indeed - carefuluniverse - October 22, 2002 - 22:35 UTC
        
        Here is SPAM - yaniru - October 23, 2002 - 14:07 UTC
    - To be honest - emperor__alikar - October 20, 2002 - 01:57 UTC
      - You're still speaking from a religious basis - stormcrow - October 20, 2002 - 07:36 UTC
        
        Well if he didn't exist - emperor__alikar - October 20, 2002 - 21:28 UTC
        
        Okay - stormcrow - October 20, 2002 - 22:41 UTC
        
        The American Age. - emperor__alikar - October 21, 2002 - 02:59 UTC
        
        It's a different world - stormcrow - October 21, 2002 - 05:31 UTC
        
        Why don't creationists date from creation - yaniru - October 21, 2002 - 11:57 UTC
        
        Most creationists only date other creationists (nt) - harvey1 - October 21, 2002 - 16:45 UTC
        
        LOL - stormcrow - October 21, 2002 - 17:05 UTC
        
        I'm in rapture - yaniru - October 23, 2002 - 14:10 UTC
        
        Answer: Because they don't believe in dating 4.5 billions years - harvey1 - October 21, 2002 - 17:20 UTC
        
        Answer: Eve was married - harvey1 - October 21, 2002 - 17:22 UTC
        
        Answer: Because there were not enough sheep to go around - harvey1 - October 21, 2002 - 17:26 UTC

Additional Information

About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy

Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins