Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
Hey , Um... Harv?

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by M.W.Pearson on October 16, 2002 16:25:32 UTC

Thank you. On the other hand, you are posting some good biology comments. From outside, it seemed clear to me that they are using debating ploys of a type which simply aren't allowed in science any more than crying helps repair a broken toy.
I feel we are in need of a new theology but not one made by celebrities beating their chests about how they've been right all along. Debates like the one we've been seeing are possibly about trying to protect untenable positions because they didn't trust God and our goodwill to still love them even though their opinions about biology need to "evolve" and their theology has to be rethought. They're not paying us to give them sparring practice, and sparring is all they're doing, not loving, I think. However,
they are beings who should be familiar with love.

Follow Ups:

    Login to Post
    Additional Information
    About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
    Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
    Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
    "dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
    are trademarks of John Huggins