Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post
Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
Well...

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Mario Dovalina on October 16, 2002 05:43:05 UTC

It's a combination of things. Back in the day, we could discuss deep things and actually make progress with the issues, because we didn't know each other or how each other thought, so the arguments were fresh and interesting (Paul, Harv, Dick, Aurino and Tenacious primarily) however now we are so familiar with each others' positions that when a discussion begins it's easy to predict within two posts how it will end. We need new blood. Backing up a few notches to discuss with you guys things that detract from genuine philosophy doesn't help (Harv's bugged by that more than me because he appreciates philosophical musings more, while I prefer the hard science, generally speaking)

Follow Ups:

    Login to Post
    Additional Information
    Google
     
    Web www.astronomy.net
    DayNightLine
    About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
    Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2022 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
    Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
    "dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
    are trademarks of John Huggins