Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post
Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
Thanks (kinda)

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Sam Patterson on October 15, 2002 15:58:04 UTC

"There are some basic assumptions that you make that are so deeply ingrained that arguing your more advanced beliefs is basically pointless since they are founded on such a faulty foundation (your beliefs that in order for science to be useful and remotely true, it must explain all inconsistencies NOW, for example.)"

Perhaps, but these 'faulty foundations' would have no effect on our Noah's ark argument.

"But I don't want you gone. I want you to address Richard on geology, I want you to address Yanniru on astronomy, I want you to address Harv on philosophy, and I want it done without ten links per post. :)"

Fair enough. I have addressed Yanniru on astronomy, I don't know what philosophy Harv presented, and I will address Rich on geology. (I am taking a geology class right know in college)
About the links....Ok. Only 5 links per post :)

Sam, KC2GWX

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
Google
 
Web www.astronomy.net
DayNightLine
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2018 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins