***The would be ridiculous if that is what I was arguing, but I'm not. My argument is not that only one animal kind was needed, but that not every species needs to be on the ark.***

You can't fit every species on the Ark and you can't fit every genus on the Ark. I doubt you can even fit a representative of every family on the Ark. You really need to become rational in your perspective.

***No I haven't I have just told you what the bible says not what my views say. The Bible says Kinds not Species, thus one doesn't have to fit every type of raptors into the ark, just one.***

You can't fit all of these lifeforms on the Ark. Why do even imagine that you could? This is completely irrational.

***However we don't know exactly what a kind really is diffined as. So instead of ridiculing the idea we should investigate, to find out exactly what a Kind is. Untill we know that you can't just say its impossible because then it wuold just be your veiw against by view with out a fact between us.***

You are simply being irrational. There is absolutely nothing in your reply that indicates that you have actually thought about the issues to our origins. It's fine if pets and farm animals are brought aboard a vessel, but in reality you do not bring a zoo of African and Asian animals let alone bringing dinosaurs and the mammals of the Tertiary. This is absolutely crazy. If you think like this then you are either indoctrinated by your beliefs or you simply do not think at all.

Aaron, you disappoint me.

• Did you read what Sam posted me? - fasteddy - October 15, 2002 - 02:55 UTC