Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post
Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
Berkeley Would Say Only Intellectuals Would Have Fallen For It

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by M.W.Pearson on October 13, 2002 05:05:11 UTC

Alan wrote:
"Now, Dr. Dick was reportedly surprised when "physics dropped out" of his analysis.
If "physics" is the "rabbit" which Dr. Dick pulled out of the "hat" (his paper)....:

Hi Alan,
Personally I have only had Physics 100
and a few dozenphysics seminars and personal reading and
...well anyway,
I was surprised when you could not answer my questions about this before you disappeared
a few weeks ago.

Dr. Dick's idea is apparently that human
physics is not really drawn from the material phenomena under observation and instead, our physics is a single version of several possible ones, that being internally consistent and therefore workable, and that the selection of this version
depends completely on our minds, and that we
poor yokels have not realized this. Please tell me yes or no to this interpretation.


Mike

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
Google
 
Web www.astronomy.net
DayNightLine
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2021 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins