Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
Sure, You're Giving Him The Ol' One-two

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Whittier on October 10, 2002 06:33:01 UTC

Hi Fast
If you want to answer his delusions, it's probably just good practice for you. If he's sincere, he will come around.
I choose instead to observe that his scientific method is wrong. He does not rely on
confirmed facts or a system with fewest contradictions, but instead on
cherished beliefs, leaps of faith, and stubbornness. I have no strong emotional investment in preferring old earth to young earth.
It simply is how the evidence truly stacks up.
Sam represents himself not as following the scientific method but instead as not being
accountable to it.
The argument is one of many. One must apply methods and rigor to be accountable. There is no
way to be accountable if the whole system does not
track to its beginning. Creationism seems to spring out of books that were Oral History 'til
about 900 BC or later. Genesis wasn't even written until almost all of it had supposedly passed into antiquity. It's not science.


Follow Ups:

    Login to Post
    Additional Information
    About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
    Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2023 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
    Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
    "dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
    are trademarks of John Huggins