Personally, I Believe Astronomical Objects Are Devoid Of Portent - an Astronomy Net God & Science Forum Message

God & Science Forum Message
Forums:	Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem


Home \| Discussion Forums \| God and Science \| Post	Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora

Personally, I Believe Astronomical Objects Are Devoid Of Portent

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Michael W. Pearson on September 21, 2002 15:23:34 UTC

What you have identified is the highly significant power of one's conscious mind to
construct impressively complex ideas from
found parts.

On this one, the simpler theory gives me comfort:
They're balls of stuff orbiting the sun.

There are several different culturally-laden ways of interpreting all the attributes of anything -- comets or otherwise.

What you have just experienced
gives an account of the beauty and
grandeur of our minds.

Brown rice,
A different "Mike"

Follow Ups:

However, the reason for that is portentious - carefuluniverse - September 22, 2002 - 22:16 UTC
- You paint? - emperor__alikar - September 23, 2002 - 02:40 UTC
  - Only a few ... - carefuluniverse - September 23, 2002 - 02:49 UTC
    - not bad... - emperor__alikar - September 23, 2002 - 03:25 UTC

Additional Information

About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy

Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins