Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Luis Hamburgh on September 20, 2002 15:20:22 UTC


Stubbornness aside, your "solution" cannot be a non-imaginary solution in 3 dimensions. If it were, it would violate Euler's Formula.

Imaginary phenomena are not any less imaginary if they're shared between groups of people. Heck, my assertion is that most people imagine the necessity of 'Ontology.' But I was hoping (a few months back) you could see this point. I guess I have again failed to show you anything (but my meanness).

Nevertheless, you continue to prove my point. You hope to disprove my oint, but this cannot be done without proving Euler wrong.


Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2018 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins