: : I am sure someone has posted something like this here allready.

: : But, I'd like to repost it if I could.

: : I would like anyone to disprove my brief theory on the : : "Supernatural"

: : It's quite simplistic really. First we have to take into : : account, one theory and a law of nature: The law of conservation and : : the "Big Bang" theory. Once you take these to things into account, : : the question arises, how did all this matter come into being? : : Well, either it was always here or it was created. In saying matter has : : always been here, we go arwy from the Big Bang theory. In saying : : that it was created in this massive explosion that started : : the Universe, we go awry from the Law of Conservation. : : Therefor, if the Big Bang theory is correct, then it is : : in fact, a proof of the existance of something beyond : : our natural laws. Something had to "Create." : : Now, is that "Somthing" the traditional Judo-Cristian "God"? : : Well, i don't know for sure about that. But it was "Something" that : : operated outside our natural laws. Hence, "supernatural".

: : Please post your comments,

: : thanks, : : Hyperiongate.

: : Beelzebub: : Yes, the Big Bang theory supports the God theory! Fortunately that theory (Big Bang) is not very smart (like the theory that the earth is the center of the universe)!

• grrrrrrrr...but I want also a text (no text) - Beelzebub - January 25, 2000 - 22:55 UTC