Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Harvey on September 15, 2002 21:57:28 UTC


***"Although our clock was designed to measure time, it appears that what is actually being measured is inferred displacement in the t direction. . . no one in the history of the world has ever been able to create a real manufactured device which will measure time."***

I already said that Dick makes conclusions from his paper. I'm talking about his use of t in his paper. Get it right.

***Obviously you can't see the discrepancy here, & experience tells me explaining it for you would be futile. Manners or no, I stand by my claims (insults) from last night: I have overestimated your wits. Hell, you didn't even get the toothpick thing ---***

You are such a troll.

***"By going 3D we are able to take advantage of the ground to complete one of a triangle. Five or six equilateral triangles can be made in this manner,"Ē etc.

Four is the maximum number allowable. You apparently donít understand much.***

Read the puzzle again.

"Take 6 toothpicks. Can you arrange them to form four (4) identical equilateral triangles ?

-No breaking toothpicks.
-No toothpicks crossing each other."

You must use 6 toothpicks to construct 4 equilateral triangles. I said that I could construct more than equilateral triangles using 6 toothpicks. At first you let on like you knew how, but you have demonstrated that you could not do it.

*** You apparently donít understand much.***

This is really humorous. You can't meet my challenge of creating more than 4 identical equilateral triangles given the above restrictions and you attack me because of your own creative limitations. Do you need help showing you why your link has probably blocked your own ability to see it?

Warm regards, Harv

Follow Ups:

    Login to Post
    Additional Information
    About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
    Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2023 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
    Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
    "dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
    are trademarks of John Huggins