Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
Thanks...that's About My Speed.

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Michael W. Pearson on August 29, 2002 16:06:02 UTC

Please allow me this moment to clarify:
I am not disputing these scientists' findings.
What I am asking is for the wording of the articles to give us a fuller description of the
phenomenon. I expect other physicists will be
the ones who will groom one another on the rigorous science. When I ask, "how is this different from absorption," I am not claiming
the two phenomena are the same. I think science writing for the public depends on questions like this for improvement, since communication is a loop with feedback. I know that I will understand better if questions like this are answered.
I will see if the article you just posted gives fuller information.
Thanks, again!

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2023 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins