Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post
Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
Hello Harv

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Alan on August 23, 2002 05:41:39 UTC

Hi Harv,

I thought you probably still read some stuff.

I liked the way you pushed the argument at Counterbalance. Debate seemed to stop when agreement was reached that "relationships exist".

I think I found a thread that when pulled, unravels Dr. Dick's whole paper perhaps.

It also turns out to map my para. 115 that I wrote in my long reply to Luis at Counterbalance (where I figured out that the brain might construct its understanding of incoming data by multi-level pattern-matching using previous experience.)

Maybe you can already see from my reply to Dr. Dick what my breakthrough is. Can you fault it? It happens to be a self-swallowing set, curiously. Is there a flaw in the logic?

Bye,

Alan

Follow Ups:

    Login to Post
    Additional Information
    Google
     
    Web www.astronomy.net
    DayNightLine
    About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
    Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
    Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
    "dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
    are trademarks of John Huggins