Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
My Position

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Aurino Souza on August 14, 2002 19:50:12 UTC

" The reason I ask this is because Aurino seems to think your model is isomorphic whith relativity "

I absolutely don't think that! At this point my knowledge of "Stafford's Relativity" is not adequate to make judgements pro or against it. However, I still find it accurate to say that (a) any model that is isomorphic to modern physics necessarily leads to similar philosophical problems, and (b) any model that is not isomorphic is either wrong or can be used to prove physics wrong.

I must add that (a) is a matter of opinion while (b) is a matter of fact.

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins