Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button
Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post
Login
Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
Oh Sorry. Apology Accepted! :)

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Sam Patterson on August 9, 2002 14:13:46 UTC

"Define "decaying." I'm not totally familiar with this. Do you mean the polarity of the entire planet is decreasing to nothing..."

Yup. And since it is decaying at a rapid rate, the Earth can not be very old. So evolutionist countered with that 'dynamo' thing I was talking about.

"I don't know if it's been recorded, however I can see no reason at all why it's not plausible."

And I can see no reason at all why it's not plausible that God created the universe in 6 days. But I have to back up this claim with data, right?

I know you don't care about chances, because the chance of evolution happening is basically nil. But what would the chances be of a comet coming into stable orbit of Uranus? It would seem highly unlikely.

KC2GWX 73's

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
Google
 
Web www.astronomy.net
DayNightLine
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2023 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins