Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post
Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
Bruce Didn't Answer Me, So You Ask Him A Question Too -- Good!

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Whittier on July 28, 2002 16:47:37 UTC

Hi Alan,
You wrote:
"I am not a crank: I invite the toughest criticism and I do not dodge it."

Well, I hope you didn't feel your exchange with me was not the "toughest criticism" or just intellectually shallow ... Can you translate
Dick's equation 1.27 into baby talk? And I mean that with utmost respect...I mean "baby calculus talk"... If you won't do it, I'll slog through it soon, but I'm amazed everyone has an opinion about it without anyone posting the equation's
translation. It's not a proof of Fermat's Last Theorem. I bet it can be comprehensively stated, with "calculus baby word ramps," in 250 words or less.

Salmon with Lemon, Cinnamon,Herbs and Butter,

Mike

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
Google
 
Web www.astronomy.net
DayNightLine
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins