But I also try to be consistent with established physical facts as well as more speculative yet fairly established theory. My Dark matter article is an example of how I think for myself. It opens up a very provocative area of thinking for physics and consciousness, not to mention god and ghosts; yet is consistent with current thinking about dark matter. I am very saddened that you are unable to provide constructive criticism of that article. I am afraid that my impression of you is dropping. I expected more.