Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post
Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
Please Bruce: Refute My Defense!

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Alan on July 23, 2002 04:22:18 UTC

Please Bruce: If Dr. Stafford is wrong, please refute my defense of him!

See my recent posts "Not so fast, Bruce"; and re: Dr. Stafford on right track, and "Continuing...".

Name-calling is not scientific argument.

He may be right. Where is my error?

Note: physicists define things. So whatever rules govern the interaction of definitions, must underpin perceived physics? Stafford apparently found those rules were the same as the physics rules.

In thinking, people compare and match patterns. This creates a kind of "pattern-match dictionary" of circular self-referential concepts, does it not? Dr. Dick apparantly figured out the rules at work in such a system.

Bruce, Bruce, Bruce: please face the technicalities!

Regards,

Alan

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
Google
 
Web www.astronomy.net
DayNightLine
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2018 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins